The Beekeeper's Apprentice
The Beekeeper's Apprentice Laurie R. King, 1994 And finally we come to the book I had already read (and re-read). This is where I may have to surrender my Holmes canon-guard certification. Because I love this book. I was worried that I wouldn't this time through, that it wouldn't hold up to a more critical eye, but I can't resist it. Yes, it would be unfair not to mention here that King occasionally uses similar tactics to those that ticked me off in other books I've written up. In Russell's first scene, her analysis is perhaps a bit too Holmesian, ( which I criticized Adler for ), but Russell is an original character, and has the advantage of having already read many of the Holmes stories. Besides which, after the first scene, she ought to sound like Holmes. King adds an introduction in which she explains why the prose doesn't read quite like Watson, and why Holmes perhaps comes off a bit differently, (a bad author habit I harped on twice